More quickly than the average growth of global demand for energy in 2024, helped to contribute to the growth of interest in nuclear energy, renewable energy and natural gas sources in 2025. The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects these trends and has output natural gas as a specific source of energy for observation. The EIA predicts that the price of Henry Haba natural gas will increase during 2025 and 2026, since the demand for export objects with liquefied USA natural gas (LNG). Since the demand exceeds the supply, investors must monitor the increase in the price of natural gas – the EIA predicts that the spa price can reach $ 4.00 for a million British thermal units (MMBTU).
Investors are optimistic on natural gas in the coming months, and in quarters there are several ways to get an impact on this resource. Firstly, investors can aim at the energy source as directly as possible, investing in future contracts. Secondly, they can study the shares of companies engaged in natural gas business. Thirdly, and most often they can invest in exchange funds (ETF) and concomitant products that provide access to futures with natural gas or baskets of bound shares.
With the growth of natural gas, investors can really be the time to consider ETF. Here are three popular options with various tricks and risk profiles.
Maximization of profits and risk management using ETF Proshares Bloomberg ETF
Proshares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas Today
Proshares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
As of 04.04.2025 21:10
- 52-week range
- $ 35.68
▼
$ 123.60
- Dividend yield
- 0.00%
- Assets under the control
- 227.98 million dollars
One of the most powerful points of access to natural gas is also one of the most risky. Proshares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF NYSEARCA: boil It provides a daily lever at a speed of 2 times in an index consisting of future natural gas. Although it does not quite imitate the point price for natural gas, taking into account the material and technical impossibility of investing in point natural gas for most investors, boiling is a worthy replacement.
Since the leftist is discarded daily, boiling is effective in active trade. Moreover, the unstable short -term movement of natural gas on natural gas means that there is a potential for significant profit for a short game when boiling, but investors are also at risk of significant losses.
This fund with a cost coefficient is 0.95%, can be contrasted with investments in Proshares Ultrashort Bloomberg ETF ETF NYSEARCA: coldWhich functions in many ways in the same way as boiling, with the exception of the fact that it offers a reverse exposure with a borrowed connection, which makes this other fund a great way for bear investors to get benefits from short -term investments.
Comparison Ung against Unl: key differences between two popular ETF natural gas for 2025
The United States 12 -month of natural gas today
The United States 12 -month of natural gas
As of 04.04.2025 21:10
- 52-week range
- $ 6.79
▼
$ 11.07
- Dividend yield
- 0.00%
- Assets under the control
- 16.42 million dollars
USCF Investments offers two metabolic products focused on natural gas, which, perhaps, should be considered: the US natural gas fund NYSEARCA: UNG and 12 -month of natural gas in the United States NYSEARCA: UnlThe UNG and UNL field, in many ways, are quite similar – they are both structured in the form of commodity bullets, both use futures contracts to track daily gas movements at exhibitions, and both have relatively high fees compared to most other ETFs on the market today.
So, how does the investor choose between these funds? UNG is the least expensive of two vehicles, with an annual fee of 1.01% compared with 1.71% Unl. It is also much more popular among investors, and the total asset base is more than 407 million US dollars as of March 27, 2025, while Unl had less than $ 16 million on the same day. UNG also has an average trading volume per month more than 60 times more than Unl, which indicates that liquidity will be much less common.
Foundation of natural gas today today
US natural gas fund
As of 04.04.2025 21:10
- 52-week range
- $ 12.35
▼
$ 24.33
- Dividend yield
- 0.00%
- Assets under the control
- 440.31 million dollars
But the biggest difference between these two options is that UNG is aimed at a contract for natural gases, as traded on Nymex, which is almost a monthly contract for the expiration, while UNL focuses on one and contracts and contracts for the next 11 months. Thus, UNG addresses more active traders and can see more significant prices than Unl, which has a more diverse basket of futures.
For investors comparing performance, each of these means has significantly surpassed S&P 500 in 2025. UNG returned 21.4% from the beginning of March 27, and UNL grew by 21.2%. In general, UNG wins the annual profit, nevertheless, from 42.2% to 29.6%. Each investor must consider how actively he plans to trade and what is the difference in diversification can bring to their portfolio before investing in UNG or Unl.
Before considering the ProShares Ultra Bloomberg natural gas, you will want to hear it.
Marketbeat monitors the highest and most effective analysts with the most effective Wall Street analysts and promotions that they recommend to their customers daily. Marketbeat has identified five shares that leading analysts quietly whisper to their customers to buy now before the wider market wins … and Proshares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas was not on the list.
While Proshares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas currently has a retention rating among analysts, analysts with the highest rating believe that these five promotions are better buying.
View five shares here
Want to know where to start (or finish) with AI shares? These 10 simple shares can help investors create long -term wealth, since artificial intelligence continues to grow into the future.
Get this free report